Stop fixing the same broken component 40 times.
Paste a URL. Openwell clusters your accessibility violations by the component that caused them, generates a validated code fix for each one, and keeps a dated record you can hand to a lawyer or a procurement officer.
No signup required for your first scan. Watch it run live — most 25-page sites finish in a few minutes.
What to expect: most sites get a handful of components an automated fix can safely apply, plus a longer list of color-contrast issues that need a human design decision. Every result says which is which — we don't count a contrast issue as “fixed” just because we found it.
A scan report is not a to-do list
It's page-level, sites are component-level
The same broken button partial appears on 40 pages and gets counted 40 times.
It says what, never what to write instead
A rule name like
button-namedoesn't tell a developer what to change.Automated tools only catch part of it
Automated scanners detect roughly a quarter to a third of WCAG failures. Focus order, meaningful alt text, error identification — the rest needs judgement.
Nothing in it is defensible
Procurement wants a dated conformance statement. A demand letter wants evidence of a remediation programme. A spreadsheet export is neither.
Deterministic first, AI only where it's needed
Stages 1–3 use zero AI. The model only runs where judgement is actually required — and every fix it proposes is re-validated by running axe-core against the patched markup before it's shown to you.
- Stage 1 · deterministicCrawlPlaywright renders every page, capturing the DOM, computed styles, screenshots, and a tab-order trace.
- Stage 2 · deterministicScanaxe-core runs against WCAG 2.1/2.2 A and AA on every page. Deterministic — zero AI, zero cost.
- Stage 3 · deterministicClusterViolations are fingerprinted back to the component that produced them, so the same broken button on 40 pages counts once, not 40 times.
- Stage 4 · AIJudgeFor what axe can't test — alt-text meaningfulness, focus order, heading sense — a vision pass runs with a confidence score on every finding.
- Stage 5 · AIFixOne code fix per component, then re-validated by re-running axe-core against the patched markup before you ever see it.
Why not just use a $29/mo scanner?
We don't sell scanning — axe-core is free and there are a dozen wrappers around it. We sell component clustering, the generated fix, and the defensible artefact.
| Alternative | Cost | Problem |
|---|---|---|
| Manual audit consultancy | $5,000–$25,000 per site, per round | One-off snapshot, stale in a month, doesn't scale to 50 client sites |
| Enterprise platform (Level Access, Siteimprove, Monsido) | ~$5,000–$15,000+/yr | Sales-led, annual contract, still only finds issues |
| Overlay widget | ~$49/mo | Discredited — the FTC fined the market leader $1M in 2025 and barred it from claiming its automated product can make a site meet an accessibility standard.¹ |
| Cheap axe-core dashboard | ~$29/mo | A commodity list of violations; no fixes, no grouping, no defensible artefact |
| Doing nothing | $0 | Settlement and remediation costs vary widely by business size — and B2B deals increasingly require a conformance report before they close |
| Openwell | $99–$799/mo, self-serve | Produces both the fix and the evidence — no sales call |
1. FTC, “FTC Approves Final Order Requiring accessiBe to Pay $1 Million” (April 2025).
Pricing
14-day trial on Starter and Pro, card required. Free is permanent and card-free.
- Free$0no card required
- 1 site
- 25 pages per scan
- Manual scans
- Component clustering
- Top 3 fixes
- Watermarked conformance report
- Starter$99/mo14-day trial, card required
- 3 sites
- 250 pages per scan
- Weekly scans
- Component clustering
- All fixes
- Judgement pass (vision)
- Conformance report
- Regression alerts
- Most popularPro$299/mo14-day trial, card required
- 15 sites
- 2,000 pages per scan
- Daily scans
- Everything in Starter
- White-label reports
- API access
- Agency$799/mobilled monthly
- 50 sites
- 10,000 pages per scan
- Daily scans
- Everything in Pro
- Client portals
- 15 seats
What we won't say
We will never declare a site meets any accessibility standard — full stop. The FTC issued a 20-year order against the category’s market leader for making exactly that kind of claim. Every Openwell report states what was tested, what passed, what failed, and what still needs a human — and every confidence score is shown to you, never hidden. Fixes are proposals: nothing is ever auto-applied to a production or default branch.